m³/year
Approximate natural gas capture during the 12-month period instead of combusting the gas.
A producer with operations in Southern Alberta, Canada needed a cost-effective alternative to vapor combustor units that could handle variable gas flow, higher discharge pressure, sudden flow interruptions, and harsh seasonal operation. VaporCommander™ provided active vapor recovery, reduced emissions, and operated through Alberta winter conditions without cold-weather stoppages, failures, or maintenance issues.
During the 12-month operating period, VaporCommander™ captured approximately 500,000 m³ of natural gas that would otherwise have been burned through a vapor combustor unit. Based on the project assumptions, captured gas created more than C$46,000/year in economic benefit, with additional potential carbon-related value subject to current regulatory eligibility and project-specific review.
Approximate natural gas capture during the 12-month period instead of combusting the gas.
Estimated annual gas value based on the assumptions used in the project case study.
No stoppages, failures, or maintenance issues related to cold weather during the operating period.
Gas flow ranged from almost no flow to approximately 1,800 m³/day.
The operator had a growing number of oil storage tanks producing natural gas from stored oil. To comply with gas venting limits, the gas could not simply be vented. Historically, vapor combustor units provided a relatively simple way to destroy the gas stream, but combustion converts usable natural gas into emissions and removes the opportunity to capture revenue from the produced gas.
The operator needed more than a combustion device. The application required a system that could handle widely varying gas flow, high discharge pressure, sudden stops in gas flow, and both cold and hot weather conditions. The system also needed to capture gas for additional revenue instead of converting the stream into CO₂ through combustion.
Although conventional VRUs were considered, standard systems did not fully address the operating envelope. Conventional VRUs can be expensive, may require additional conditioning equipment, and can be limited where discharge pressures exceed typical compressor-suction assumptions.
Tank vapors had to be controlled to meet regulatory gas venting requirements.
VCUs can reduce venting, but they burn natural gas and create greenhouse gas emissions.
The gas stream ranged from almost no flow to approximately 1,800 m³/day.
The solution had to operate in Southern Alberta, Canada winters that can drop below -40°C.
Vapor combustor units can be cost-effective and simple, but their basic function is destruction rather than recovery. They do not actively draw down tank pressure, they do not create a gas revenue stream, and they do not eliminate the emissions profile associated with burning natural gas.
A VCU burns gas that could otherwise be captured and monetized. In this case, replacing combustion with recovery created more than C$46,000/year in estimated gas value.
Combustion reduces venting but releases CO₂. The project analysis estimated 1,196 tonnes CO₂e/year of avoided emissions by capturing gas instead of burning it.
The VCU was a passive system. VaporCommander™ actively draws down and maintains a user-defined inlet pressure, giving operators more control over tank vapor management.
Fluidstream’s patented VaporCommander™ was installed at an oil battery in Southern Alberta, Canada in March 2020. It was selected because it could handle the producer’s variable operating parameters while capturing gas for reuse or sale instead of burning it through a combustor.
The unit’s multiphase capability allowed it to handle gas streams that may contain liquids without relying on a conventional dry-gas assumption. The system also offered autonomous operation, including manual, remote, and automatic restart based on user-defined time lag and motor-load ramp-up.
During the 12-month operating period, VaporCommander™ captured approximately 500,000 m³ of natural gas. Based on the pricing assumptions used in the project case study, that captured gas created an estimated economic benefit of more than C$46,000/year.
The case study also described potential carbon-tax savings if a carbon tax were applied to combustion emissions. Carbon pricing, carbon-credit eligibility, and regulatory treatment should be reviewed under current rules for each project.
The gas flow ranged from almost no flow to approximately 1,800 m³/day. VaporCommander™ used patented software controls and operating methodology to monitor sensors and operating parameters, adjust speed, and maintain target inlet pressure. The unit could slow to less than 0.01 strokes per minute, which eliminated the need for mechanical recirculatory devices in this application.
The system managed gas flow from near-zero conditions to high vapor rates, supporting stable tank vapor control across changing production conditions.
The unit adjusted speed to maintain the operator’s desired inlet and discharge pressure setpoints.
Manual, remote, and automatic restart logic helped maintain uptime even during upset or low-flow conditions.
According to the operator’s facilities engineer, the ability to adjust operating parameters and allow the unit to self-regulate was valuable because it reduced the need for ongoing intervention once the desired setpoints and controls were established. This is a key operational distinction from passive combustion equipment and many conventional vapor recovery configurations.
During the 12-month operating period, VaporCommander™ operated without failures, maintenance issues, service issues, stoppages, or cold-weather-related problems, except for a minor fix related to an incorrectly sized hose and cylinder. The system also operated through winter conditions without stoppages, failures, or issues related to cold weather.
“The ability to adjust various parameters and allow the unit to self-regulate to maintain our desired inlet and discharge pressures is wonderful. Once you have it dialed in for various target setpoints and PID control, there is little to no intervention required.”
Conventional compressors and VRU systems can experience winter problems when they depend on upstream separators or scrubbers to remove liquids before compression. In cold Alberta conditions, water and condensate can freeze inside separators, scrubbers, drains, and level-control equipment.
When liquids freeze in separator drains or scrubber bottoms, the equipment may no longer remove liquids effectively, increasing liquid carryover risk.
Freezing can impair level instrumentation, control response, and dump operation, creating unstable upstream conditioning.
If liquid reaches a conventional gas-only compressor, the result can include hydraulic loading, lubrication problems, shutdowns, or increased maintenance.
Scrubbers, drain systems, piping, controls, and filters all become additional cold-weather maintenance points.
VaporCommander™ is designed to handle wet gas within compression, reducing reliance on upstream separation as the primary reliability strategy.
The operating period reported no stoppages, failures, or maintenance issues related to cold weather.
Replacing a vapor combustor with VaporCommander™ changed the economics of the vapor stream. Instead of burning gas with no payout, the operator captured gas that could generate value. The project analysis estimated approximately C$46,400/year of value from captured gas based on forward AECO 5A pricing of C$2.50/GJ and 947.82 ft³/GJ.
Fluidstream’s patent portfolio supports the operating logic behind VaporCommander™: handling wet, variable vapor streams directly rather than forcing the site into a conventional dry-gas compression model. These patents support Fluidstream’s technical position around wet-gas handling, variable-flow operation, and liquid-aware compression response.
A primary anchor for liquid-aware compression response and chamber behavior when liquids influence the compression process.
Supports Fluidstream’s broader compression architecture and oil and gas compression relevance.
Canadian patent coverage supporting Fluidstream’s foundational technology and operating methodology.
For operators evaluating alternatives to vapor combustors, conventional VRUs, or scrubber-dependent vapor recovery systems, VaporCommander™ directly addresses the operating window where wet gas, variable gas flow, winter reliability, and low-maintenance operation matter most.
The case demonstrates that vapor recovery can do more than eliminate venting. When the system can handle real oilfield conditions, vapor recovery can capture gas value, support emissions objectives, reduce dependence on combustion, and provide active pressure control.
Fluidstream can review tank vapor rate, discharge pressure, variable gas flow, wet gas composition, condensate and water exposure, winter operating requirements, power availability, emissions obligations, gas value, and site economics to determine whether VaporCommander™ is a fit.